A New Jersey Supreme Court committee wants to allow evidence of witnesses’ prior false accusations in civil and family proceedings, and some advocates for battered women don’t like the idea.

The proposal by the Committee on the Rules of Evidence would expand to civil cases a narrow exception to New Jersey Evidence Rule 608, crafted by the court in 2004, that allowed evidence of prior false accusations to impeach a victim-witness’s credibility in criminal proceedings.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]