The federal appellate courts are split over the issue of whether lawyers who will argue an appeal should receive advance notice as to which three judges have been assigned to the oral argument panel. Despite attorneys' seemingly universal preference for learning judges' identities beforehand, judges in some circuits have been able to enforce their preference against advance disclosure. Attorney Howard J. Bashman considers whether this is an area for which a uniform rule should be adopted.
April 03, 2006 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Related: Bashman Archive
The federal appellate courts are divided over an issue that rarely receives any attention: Whether lawyers who will orally argue an appeal should receive advance notice of which three judges have been assigned to the oral argument panel.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
