Today, the Supreme Court takes up a potentially historic challenge raising vital questions about the allocation of power among Congress, the president and the federal courts in the war on terror. But first it must decide whether it has the authority to decide.

In one sense, accused enemy combatant Salim Ahmed Hamdan is a bit player in the much larger drama unfolding in the nation: The Bush administration faces increasing scrutiny for policies — such as the use of torture in interrogations and a domestic surveillance program — pursued in the name of the war on terror.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]