In a major victory for business groups, the U.S. Supreme Court held Tuesday that the validity of a contract that includes an arbitration provision must be decided by an arbitrator, not a state judge — unless what’s challenged is the arbitration provision itself.

The 7-1 decision in Buckeye Check Cashing v. Cardegna et al. overturned a January 2005 ruling by the Florida Supreme Court that a state court first must establish whether the underlying contract at issue in Buckeye violated state or federal law before its arbitration provision could be enforced. The nation’s highest court ruled that the Federal Arbitration Act took precedence over Florida law.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]