Was Mark Livingston trying to blow the whistle on suspect corporate behavior at pharmaceutical maker Wyeth and protect shareholders? Or was he making trouble? Next week, a judge in Greensboro, N.C., will weigh those questions, as the two sides present arguments as to whether the lawsuit should be dismissed or go to trial. The answer could have implications for companies, workers and investors well beyond the bitter dispute between Livingston and Wyeth.
February 10, 2006 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Was Mark Livingston trying to blow the whistle on suspect corporate behavior and protect his company’s shareholders? Or was he making trouble?
Next week, a judge in Greensboro, N.C., will parse through the story of Livingston and the company that fired him, pharmaceutical maker Wyeth, and weigh those questions. The answer could have implications for companies, workers and investors well beyond their bitter dispute.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
