A Manhattan woman’s violation-of-privacy suit, which alleges that participants in the Home Box Office show “Family Bonds” made crude comments about “the effects looking at [her had] on their respective libidos,” highlights the challenges that reality TV shows face under New York state law.
Supreme Court Justice Debra A. James has denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss, holding that the defense failed to satisfy the “real relationship” standard for a violation-of-privacy defense, which requires a connection between the use of a person’s likeness and the editorial message of a program.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]