The Supreme Court on Wednesday kept alive a lawsuit filed against several customs agents by a New York computer software company driven out of business when the owner's husband was mistakenly targeted in a child pornography investigation. The Court had been asked to decide the extent of government immunity in such cases and whether Susan and Richard Hallock of Mohawk, N.Y., can sue individual customs agents for damaging computer hard drives and other property seized in a raid.
January 19, 2006 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The Supreme Court on Wednesday kept alive a lawsuit filed against several customs agents by an upstate New York computer software company driven out of business when the owner’s husband was mistakenly targeted in a child pornography investigation.
A trial judge and appeals court had said that the owner of the software company and her husband could pursue a lawsuit. And the Supreme Court unanimously refused to stop the case.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
