Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
The ability of drugs to produce a psychotic state is outside the average juror's knowledge, a New York appellate court has ruled, holding that a trial judge's refusal to allow a defendant to present expert testimony on the issue constituted reversible error. The trial judge said the psychiatrist would "testify about fancy-dancy things," and instead pointed to movies such as "Reefer Madness" and "Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas" that she said featured substance-induced psychotic episodes.
December 30, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS