X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
One need not specifically ask “Will you marry me?” to make a marriage proposal official, a Manhattan judge has ruled. Supreme Court Justice Faviola Soto ordered Emily DiGaetano to return a $53,000 engagement ring to her ex-fiance, Manhattan businessman Vito W. Lucchetti, holding that the ring was a gift in contemplation of marriage. “Both parties agree that the law requires that gifts made in contemplation of marriage, i.e., an engagement ring, can be recovered without regard to fault,” Soto wrote in Lucchetti v. DiGaetano, 109231/05. “Although defendant claims that there were no ‘magic’ words spoken on the exchange of the ring such as ‘Will you marry me,’ it is clear from the facts that she accepted the ring as an engagement ring,” the judge concluded. Lucchetti gave his ex-future-bride-to-be the white-gold ring in July 2003. After the engagement ended, he filed an application for a temporary restraining order to prevent DiGaetano from selling the ring. She cross-moved for summary judgment and attorney fees. Joseph DeSimone and Bernard Clair of Clair, Greifer represented Lucchetti. Solo practitioner Jo Ann Douglas represented DiGaetano. While the two sides may have agreed on the controlling law regarding no-longer-needed engagement rings, they disagreed as to whether their clients were in fact ever engaged. DiGaetano claimed her former beau “did not intend to marry her as he would not set a wedding date and had one other romantic interest during their alleged engagement,” according to the decision. She also “hurl[ed] painful allegations of fault” against Lucchetti in order to establish his lack of intent to marry. Justice Soto nonetheless granted Lucchetti’s motion for summary judgment. “There is a strong public policy against public trials of heart-wounding tribulations,” Soto wrote, citing Friedman v. Geller, 82 Misc. 2d 291. “Stripping the defendant’s affidavit of all fault allegations, what we have left is insufficient to establish an issue of fact which precludes summary judgment,” she concluded. Clair said that while state courts may be divided, the law in the 1st Department regarding the post-break-up return of engagement rings is well settled. “Our courts recognize that an engagement ring is a type of gift that enjoys a special status,” he said. “It’s deemed conditional until the marriage actually takes place. If it does not take place, then it’s one of the rare times that the court will rule that the gift never was completed — even though it sits on the finger of the recipient.” Douglas declined to comment. The decision, however, turned out to be superfluous. The day before Soto issued it, the two sides agreed to a settlement and DiGaetano returned the ring.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.