Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
After learning that jurors had consulted a dictionary to determine the meaning of "preponderance," a New York judge has thrown out their verdict. The jury had cleared two police officers of sexually harassing two subordinates. Plaintiffs counsel moved to set aside the verdict on the basis of jury misconduct after learning that during deliberations, the jury foreman read aloud the dictionary definition. The judge agreed with the motion, finding "a sufficient likelihood that plaintiffs were prejudiced."
August 04, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS