Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
Dictionaries, it turns out, aren't the best source for defining the terms in a patent. After years of conflicting opinions, the Federal Circuit ruled en banc Tuesday that courts should look to the language in the patent itself rather than turn first to dictionaries to determine the meaning of patent claims. While many patent lawyers were jubilant, Judge Haldane Mayer wrote a scalding dissent, saying the Federal Circuit had substituted the black box of the jury "with the black hole of this court."
July 14, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS