Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
A trial court's ruling admitting a victim's identification of an attacker as an excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule does not violate a recent U.S. Supreme Court cases that buttressed defendants' rights under the confrontation clause, a New York appellate court has ruled. The court upheld the introduction of the phrase "that's them" by a victim who was lying in an ambulance after the attack, but who did not appear at trial to testify about the defendant's identity.
June 30, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS