The Supreme Court refused Monday to clarify how much the government should pay savings and loans that say they lost billions after Congress changed accounting rules. The Court also declined to consider whether an employer can ask about the immigration status of a group of Latina and Southeast Asian women suing for discrimination. In addition, the Court won't consider whether a black truck driver accused in the deaths of 19 illegal immigrants was improperly singled out for a death sentence due to race.
March 08, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The Supreme Court refused Monday to clarify how much the government should pay savings and loans who say they lost billions after Congress abruptly changed accounting rules to bail out the industry.
Justices declined to review a $381 million judgment to Glendale Federal Savings, a former Southern California thrift that is now part of Citigroup Inc.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
