Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
When allegations of jurors seeking extrajudicial opinions prior to deliberations are lodged post-verdict, trial courts should follow an "objective test for prejudice" in determining whether a hearing on those claims is merited, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled. The court found that a Philadelphia judge should have held a post-trial hearing after receiving a letter from a juror alleging that fellow jurors had discussed a medical malpractice action with physicians they knew personally.
January 25, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS