Attorneys Paul Utrecht and Andrew Zacks had reason to celebrate when the high court agreed Friday to review a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals opinion in a case brought by owners of the San Remo Hotel. The two attorneys sued the city of San Francisco in federal and state court in 1993, asserting that requiring hotel owners to pay fees to change from a residential to a tourist hotel amounted to illegal takings. The case, said lawyer Paul Utrecht, has been "a long and winding road."
December 14, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The U.S. Supreme Court pushed the light at the end of the tunnel out of sight Friday for three San Francisco lawyers who have spent more than a decade battling over the constitutionality of a city hotel law.
Nevertheless, Paul Utrecht and Andrew Zacks had reason to celebrate when the high court agreed to review the April opinion from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a case brought by owners of the San Remo Hotel.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
