Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Supreme Court declined Monday to consider whether retailer Kmart Corp. should have been allowed to pay more than $300 million to key suppliers immediately after filing for bankruptcy protection. Justices let stand a 7th Circuit ruling that declared Kmart had no authority to pay certain suppliers because it had not proven that the suppliers were so critical to Kmart's operations to justify payments to them over others. The high court's move left lower courts split on the issue.
November 16, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS