Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
The California Supreme Court agreed Wednesday to decide whether trial judges have the authority to award attorney fees to individuals filing anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) motions -- even if the original complaints have been voluntarily dismissed. The decision could have a major impact: Estimates indicate the high court and the state's appeal courts have issued more than 100 anti-SLAPP rulings in the past decade, with untold numbers of cases in the trial courts.
October 29, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS