Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
An attorney who learned information from a prospective client that may be "significantly harmful" to that potential client would be prohibited from representing another person whose interests are "materially adverse" to the prospective client's in a related matter, according to a new rule proposed by the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. The proposed rule would impose a duty of confidentiality to the prospective client "even when no client-lawyer relationship ensues."
October 27, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS