Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
In determining which of two related insurance entities was a plaintiffs insurer for the purposes of the bad-faith statute, Pennsylvania courts should look more to companies' actions than to their corporate structures, a three-judge panel of the Superior Court has ruled in an apparent case of first impression. "There is no simple rule for determining who is the insurer for purposes of the bad faith statute," the court wrote.
September 15, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS