Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
When removing a multidefendant case to federal court, all defendants must formally join in the removal petition and cannot simply inform the court in one petition that all defendants have "consented" to the removal, a federal judge in Pennsylvania has ruled. Citing a "meeting of the minds" requirement as well as diversity prerequisites, U.S. District Judge Anita B. Brody wrote that "one defendant may not speak for another in filing a notice of removal."
February 24, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS