Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
In a ruling that three concurring justices called "potentially confusing," the California Supreme Court has refused to adopt the federal courts' doctrine of sentencing entrapment. The majority opinion, by Justice Janice Rogers Brown, included a lengthy discussion of sentencing manipulation and what constitutes "outrageous conduct" by law enforcement officials in entrapment situations, but then said the case at hand was the wrong one to address those issues.
December 24, 2003 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS