Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
The federal appeals court for Georgia, Florida and Alabama has unanimously thrown out its 29-year-old precedent that said wiretap laws do not apply to a husband secretly recording his wife's telephone conversations. But the court split 7-4 in deciding that their ruling should apply retroactively to an Alabama man who secretly placed a recording device on a phone in his home, which he was sharing with his soon-to-be ex-wife.
October 22, 2003 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS