Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
A juror's alleged admission that he researched a defendant's financial condition on the Internet prior to deliberations that resulted in a verdict of nearly $2 million is not grounds for ordering a new trial since the information would have been admissible at trial, a federal judge in Philadelphia has ruled. The judge found "that no prejudice could have resulted from a juror's exposure to the defendants' Web sites."
November 08, 2002 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS