Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found that the word "for" in a policy exclusion clause rendered it ambiguous and so upheld a decision that the insurer must pay the medical bills of a child who was diagnosed with leukemia five days after a health insurance policy took effect. At issue was if the child suffered from a "pre-existing condition" because she was treated two days before the policy started by a doctor who didn't make the diagnosis.
August 26, 2002 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS