Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
It seems so ironic: One of the supreme masterworks of music, which has gripped legions of scholars and performers for ages, was meant to put its first audience to sleep! The so-called Goldberg Variations of Johann Sebastian Bach (1685-1750) is believed to have been a gift to Count Kayserling, an influential musical devotee who had secured Bach an appointment as official composer to the Saxon court. Beyond being a deep honor, the title served Bach well, providing him with much-needed royal protection against the pettiness of his employers, with whom he rarely got along. From his earliest days as a church organist, Bach was faulted for confusing congregations with flights of invention rather than strictly accompanying their hymns. Throughout his career, he constantly railed against the inadequacy of the players and the resources with which he had to work. The count suffered from bouts of insomnia and had hired one of Bach’s finest pupils, the 14-year-old Johann Gottlieb Goldberg, to play for him during his restless nights. To soothe the count, Bach wrote this piece, formally entitled “Aria With Diverse Variations for Harpsichord With Two Manuals,” in 1741. In gratitude, the count sent Bach 100 louis d’or, an extraordinary sum far exceeding his annual salary. Bach clearly cherished the Variations, as they made up one of only four volumes of keyboard works he ever published. Yet, while Bach was revered during his lifetime as a great organist who could brilliantly improvise an entire two-hour concert, his compositions were largely dismissed as the type of functional and disposable material that all performers of the time were expected to produce routinely for their own use. We now acclaim Bach’s art as the culmination of a millennium of musical development. Serious Western music began in the Middle Ages with the Gregorian chant, a stylization of speech in which a bare melody imitated the verbal inflection of prayer. Chant was a continuous horizontal art, using a single note at a time, and the first glimmer of change came around 1100 by adding another voice at the octave, fifth or fourth. Next, melodies were added above the foundation of a chant. Polyphony flowered, as up to four independent voices competed for attention. By the 18th century, the system had matured into an extraordinary secular profusion of forms, harmonies and rhythms. Bach’s “Art of Fugue” and “Well-Tempered Clavier” are often considered the apex of polyphony and the purest expression of his creativity. But perhaps the ultimate display of the full range of Bach’s art, as well as the outlet for his deepest, most personal feelings, is the Goldberg Variations. Like all great music, the key to understanding it lies in admiring the fantasy and ingenuity within formal restrictions — freedom within limits. Bach begins and ends with a simple, gracious, unadorned song (or aria) he had written years earlier for his wife. Unlike most variations that focus upon a melody, the Goldberg set follows only the bass of Bach’s song and its implied harmonies. Each of the 30 variations retains the aria’s structure of two complementary halves, the first rising from tonic to dominant, and the second, through a chromatic excursion, returning back home to the tonic. But within that basic design, they comprise an amazing abundance of styles and moods. Every third variation is a canon in which regular repetitions of a simple melody overlap and intermingle (as in “Row, Row, Row Your Boat”). The first canon (Variation No. 3) is in unison (that is, each repetition begins on the same note as the original), and then the intervals increase: No. 6 is at the second, No. 9 at the third, all the way up to No. 27 at the ninth. Bach clearly was intrigued with formal possibilities — his personal copy of the Goldberg Variations, found only in 1975, contained sketches for 14 more canons on the same bass. Amid the canons are a lusty dance (No. 4), a graceful waltz (No. 7), a fugue (No. 10), swirling arpeggiations (No. 11), a dreamy reverie (No. 15), an overture (No. 16), a quidoblet (No. 30, in which Bach playfully combines two folk songs) and, most striking of all, an astoundingly modern-sounding chromatic meditation (No. 25) in which all conventional notions of tempo seem suspended. The density ranges from rudimentary two-parts (the aria itself) to fiendishly difficult passages of rapid note clusters (Nos. 14 and 23), blindingly fast trills (No. 28) and a furious sinuous line split between the hands (No. 29), the intertwining parts of which are far harder to realize on modern instruments than on those of Bach’s time which had a separate keyboard for each hand. Bach never expected his music to survive him. Indeed, toward the end of his life, polyphonic music like the Goldberg Variations, in which each voice was of equal importance, was already considered old-fashioned. Even his own sons were pioneering a new and simpler style of harmonized melodies that would form the basis for nearly all the music we now love. While Mozart, Beethoven and other professionals would become enthralled with the structural marvels of Bach’s finely crafted polyphony, the public relegated both the music and the harpsichord for which it was written to museums and ancient texts. There they languished until 1903, when a young Polish pianist launched their revival. Through the remaining six decades of her life, Wanda Landowska tirelessly researched, taught, performed and crusaded for the harpsichord (in which strings are plucked with quills rather than struck with a padded hammer, as in a piano) and for “authentic” Bach, albeit through the filter of her own considerable ego. Her concerts were theatrical events, given from stages set as Baroque living rooms, as if to demand that audiences enter her antiquated world. When a pianist dared to criticize her performance, Landowska generated one of the great put-downs of all time, replying, “That’s fine, dear. You play Bach your way, and I’ll play Bach his way!” Given her crucial role in restoring Bach to public favor, it’s fitting that Landowska waxed the very first recording of the Goldberg Variations in 1933 (now on EMI 61008, coupled with a massively dramatic “Chromatic Fantasy and Fugue”). Unfortunately, the crude sound wipes out the sparkling harmonics that give the harpsichord its distinctive flavor, a problem only partially cured in her 1946 remake (BMG 60919). Despite her fervent advocacy, and although a revelation in its time, Landowska’s playing is dignified, reserved and somewhat stodgy and graceless, although charged with a compelling sense of humanism and resolve that remains deeply touching. Although the harpsichord is impervious to touch (producing the same volume and tone no matter how a key is pressed), Landowska compensates for the fixed dynamics by intensively coloring her tone through exploiting various registers of her custom-built instrument. A second pioneer was another young pianist, Canadian Glenn Gould, who chose the Goldberg Variations for his sensational debut recording in 1955. In marked contrast to Landowska’s deference to authenticity, Gould regarded Bach as ripe for modern exploration and realized his deeply personal vision of extreme tempos, huge dynamics and phenomenal technique on a concert grand. His album (Sony SK 52594) still startles with its precision, crisp rhythms and dazzlingly clear counterpoint. Vibrant and exciting, yet deeply respectful of the inherent values of the source, it ushered in modern enthusiasm for Bach by combining the feel of a harpsichord with the romantic impulse and augmented resources of the piano-several variations are blindingly swift, while in the heart-rending No. 25, time nearly stands still, hanging on each poignant note. If portions seem a bit detached, a 1959 Salzburg concert (Sony SMK 52685) preserves much of the studio volatility while adding more feeling and atmosphere. In the last half-century, the popularity of the Goldberg Variations has soared. A Japanese Web site having charmingly fractured English and the clever URL of www.a30a.com (get the pun?) currently catalogs 240 separate recordings (plus hundreds of reissues) on LP and CD, ranging from the traditional harpsichord or piano to arrangements for strings, organ and brass band. If Bach could return after a quarter millennium, surely he would be astounded! Of the several dozen renditions currently available, perhaps the most distinctive is by Rosalyn Tureck (DG 459 599), which includes a marvelous CD-ROM feature of a score that can be printed or followed on-screen and that compels appreciation for Bach’s wondrous construction. In addition, a MIDI element lets you experiment with dynamics, phrasing, embellishments and tempos to craft your own performance (and in the process to grasp the artistic value of these techniques). As for Tureck’s rarefied, magisterial performance, it’s a throwback to Bach’s culture, light-years removed from our present age of immediate gratification. Her deliberate unfolding of a multilayered masterpiece observes all repeats and consumes 91 minutes (Gould’s ran 37!), charging every phrase with cosmic weight and emerging as a profound experience. Equally personal is a 1968 recording by Maria Yudina (Philips 456 994), who played as she lived — an outcast religious dissident in Communist Russia whose irrepressible sense of freedom kindled her artistry. Sharing Bach’s belief in music as a direct route to God, she invests every note with gripping conviction and even adds her own embellishments. Yudina’s Goldbergs combine enormously assertive and virile strength with startling dynamics and enormous rhythmic elasticity. Music this rich will continue to attract great artists and inspire striking renditions in every generation. Among the most recent interpreters, Murray Perahia, from July 2000 (Sony 88243), displays exquisite sensitivity and breathtaking control, with every phrase beautifully shaped. Still not convinced? To test the waters, you might try Christiane Jaccottet on Point 265011. While lacking the vision and polish of the others and despite incorrectly labeled tracks, minimal packaging, and a rushed and ineffective Variation No. 25, it sells for only a few bucks and manages to convey the basic idea. Could I ever imagine these compelling records lulling me to sleep? Not in my wildest dreams! Peter Gutmann is a partner at the Washington, D.C., communications firm Pepper & Corazzini and can be reached at [email protected] Music articles by the author are posted on his Web site at www.classicalnotes.net.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.