X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission announced on April 25, 2001 the filing of a nationwide class lawsuit against Northwest Airlines, Inc (NWA), based in Eagan, Minnesota. The suit was filed under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA). The suit charges NWA with disability discrimination through its adoption of a company-wide policy barring the hiring of persons for certain laborer positions. Specifically, the policy prevents the hiring of individuals for these jobs if they have seizure disorders or other disabilities that may pose the risk of a loss of consciousness, regardless of how remote the risk may be. According to the suit, NWA’s so-called “zero acceptability” policy prohibits hiring people with insulin-dependent diabetes or epilepsy requiring anti-seizure medication for jobs as airplane cleaners and baggage handlers. The suit also alleges that NWA violated the ADA by failing and refusing to individually assess applicants’ ability to perform essential job functions, as well as by failing and refusing to individually assess whether the applicants posed a direct threat that could be reduced with reasonable accommodations. “This lawsuit should remind employers that disability does not necessarily equate with inability,” said Jean P. Kamp, regional attorney of the EEOC’s Milwaukee District Office, which has enforcement jurisdiction for Minnesota. “Employers are required to make individualized assessments and provide reasonable accommodations, as appropriate, to allow persons with disabilities to perform the essential functions of the job at hand. In this case, Northwest Airlines is accused of violating the ADA on both counts.” The EEOC’s suit, filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota, alleges that NWA discriminated against a class of applicants by refusing to hire them as baggage handlers or aircraft cleaners. The class of aggrieved individuals includes Larry Lewis and Timothy Rued, both of whom were applicants at NWA’s Minneapolis facility at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, Serita Nellum, an applicant at the Detroit facility, and other similarly situated persons. According to the suit, the charging parties, each of whom has a disability that requires medication, were qualified to perform the duties of the aforementioned positions which consisted primarily of handling baggage and cleaning airplanes between flights. The EEOC seeks relief for the affected applicants, which includes compensatory and punitive damages of up to $300,000 per claimant, and an end to any discriminatory employment practices by NWA. Laurie Vasichek, the EEOC’s lead trial attorney in the case, said, “This litigation is an example of the Commission’s ongoing efforts to challenge discriminatory hiring policies and practices under the Americans with Disabilities Act. The refusal to hire in this case was based on myths, fears, and stereotypes associated with particular disability-related conditions, rather than on the applicants’ actual ability to do the job.” Since July 1992, when Title I of the ADA became effective, the EEOC has obtained approximately $325 million under the ADA on behalf of more than 20,000 individuals through its enforcement efforts including settlements, conciliations, mediation, and litigation. In addition, the EEOC has obtained non-monetary benefits for over 10,000 individuals, including reasonable accommodation, policy changes, training and education, job referrals, union membership, and the posting of EEO notices at job sites. � 2001, CCH INCORPORATED. All Rights Reserved.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.