X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Since the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc., 120 S.Ct. 2097 (2000), the pretext-plus standard of evidence is no longer a proper standard for the burden of proof under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967. A 54-year-old applicant, with 26 years of city management experience, was not hired for the position of city manager. Instead, the city hired an engineer in his 30s. The older applicant presented evidence that the city’s mayor and some councilmen had intended to hire a “younger” candidate, one they described as “not putting down roots.” ( Ratliff v. City of Gainesville, Texas, 5th Cir, 81 EPD �40,782) At trial, the district court failed to instruct the jury that if the applicant could prove that the city’s alleged nonbiased reasons for refusing to hire him were pretexts for age bias, the jury could infer that the city had discriminated against him on the basis of age. Rather, the court instructed the jury on the “pretext-plus” standard for the applicant’s burden of proof, meaning that he had to provide evidence of age bias in addition to proof that the city’s reasons were pretextual. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held that, since the Reeves decision, circuit precedent followed the “permissive pretext” burden of proof, which only required the applicant to present evidence of pretext in order to create an inference that the employer had failed to select him on the basis of his age. Consequently, the circuit court held that the trial court erred in instructing the jury as to the pretext-plus standard, and along with other findings, reversed the decision favoring the city and remanded the case for a new trial. � 2001, CCH INCORPORATED. All Rights Reserved.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.