Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Four hours before he was scheduled to die, a state appeals court delayed the execution Wednesday of Napoleon Beazley, whose case has fractured the U.S. Supreme Court and fueled fresh criticism of applying the death penalty to teen-agers. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals granted the delay to Beazley, who killed the father of a federal appeals court judge in a botched carjacking in 1994. “Applicant is granted a stay of execution pending further orders by this court,” the court’s two-page order read. “The applicant presents 10 allegations challenging the validity of his conviction and resulting sentence.” Beazley, who was 17 at the time of the killing, was scheduled to receive a lethal injection Wednesday. He was writing a letter in a small cell next to the death chamber when he learned of the delay, authorities said. “I just have to comprehend this,” prison officials said he told them. Calls to Beazley’s attorney, Walter Long, were not immediately returned. Prosecutor Jack Skeen said he was disappointed by the ruling. “We still hold the execution is proper and the just sentence in this case,” he said. Beazley, now 25, was to be returned to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Polunsky Unit, prison spokesman Larry Todd said. Beazley never denied his role in the slaying, but his appeal to the state court listed 10 reasons for a reprieve, including constitutional claims, allegations of false testimony, jury bias and his age at the time of the killing. The state attorney general’s office opposed the motion; many of the arguments have been made in earlier appeals and rejected by the courts. Beazley still has an appeal before the U.S. Supreme Court seeking a broader review of his case, including whether the Constitution bars executing people who were under 18 when they committed their crimes. Texas Gov. Rick Perry also could issue a reprieve. The case has drawn international attention and put the Supreme Court in an unusual position. The victim’s son, Judge J. Michael Luttig of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Va., has ties to three of the justices. Luttig clerked for Antonin Scalia and advised Clarence Thomas and David Souter during their confirmation hearings. They did not participate earlier this week when the Supreme Court refused to halt the execution in a 3-3 vote, with three abstentions. Beazley would be the 19th U.S. prisoner to die since 1976 for a murder committed by a person younger than 18. He would be the 10th in Texas, where he was among 31 death row inmates who were 17 at the time of their crime. In Texas, a capital murder committed at age 17 makes an offender eligible for the death penalty. In a 1989 ruling on a case from Kentucky, the high court said death sentences for defendants as young as 16 were constitutional. Beazley was convicted of murdering John Luttig, a prominent businessman. Luttig, 63, and his wife were returning home to Tyler, Texas, when the slaying occurred in front of their house. Testimony at Beazley’s trial showed he stood in a pool of blood while going through Luttig’s pockets, searching for the car keys. He abandoned the car a short distance away after hitting a wall, damaging the vehicle. Beazley also fired at the victim’s wife. He missed, but she played dead while her husband lay beside her. “The acts of Napoleon Beazley that night were a predatory hunt-down,” Skeen has said. Beazley, a football star at Grapeland High in Texas and the senior class president, acknowledged a darker side driven by “peer pressure.” He sold small amounts of cocaine and carried a pistol. The night of the murder, he had a sawed-off shotgun in his car. “I’m a different person now,” he said in a recent interview. “You come here and you grow. I was a different person then.” Death penalty opponents from around the world have inundated Skeen with letters and cards protesting the execution. The European Union, through the Belgian Embassy in Washington, has urged Perry to stop the execution. The governor, however, has refused to halt any of the 11 other executions in Texas since he took office last year. Amnesty International, using the Beazley case as a springboard, issued a report critical of the United States and Texas, in particular, for allowing executions in such cases. “We are still calling on all the authorities to stop this execution and to stop execution of children in this country,” said Sue Gunawardena-Baughn, an Amnesty International director. Before the court’s ruling, Perry said he still supports the law allowing 17-year-olds to be sentenced to death. “My son’s 17, and I am comfortable that my son understands right from wrong,” he said. Later, Perry declined comment on the ruling. “It’s still before the courts,” said his spokesman, Gene Acuna. In June, the state court temporarily halted another execution. The man was executed last week. Copyright 2001 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.