Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
A Wisconsin judge denied the claim of two insurance companies who had challenged their liability for $75 million of insurance coverage in a crane accident that killed three men working on the Milwaukee Brewers’ new ballpark. The case stemmed from a December 2000 jury verdict ordering Mitsubishi Heavy Industries of America to pay $99.25 million in damages, $94 million of it punitives. Mitsubishi, the stadium roof subcontractor, was found liable for the collapse of the crane that killed the men on July 14, 1999, because supervisors improperly authorized its use during heavy winds. The case will now be heard by an appeals court. Wischer v. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries of America, No. 99-CV-6553 (Milwaukee Co., Wis., Cir. Ct.). The insurance companies, Federal Insurance Co., one of the Chubb Group of Insurance Cos. and Travelers Indemnity Co. of Illinois, provided $50 million and $25 million, respectively, in insurance for the project, according to plaintiffs’ lawyer Robert Habush. During the trial, a Mitsubishi supervisor stated that he failed to make additional wind calculations in relation to the weight the crane carried, despite the manufacturer’s warning. In the insurance coverage suit, the insurance companies alleged that Mitsubishi committed intentional acts in harming the men, which are not covered by the companies’ policies. Through various settlements, Habush of Milwaukee’s Habush, Habush, Davis & Rottier has negotiated about $27 million so far from the defendants. If the insurance companies had prevailed in the Aug. 6 ruling, the plaintiffs only stood to gain an additional $10 million from Mitsubishi. Habush expects the case, with any appeals of the ruling on the insurance company’s liability, to be consolidated before the appellate court. “It will be interesting to see how the court deals with the insurance companies saying the conduct bordered on criminal and Mitsubishi saying there wasn’t any evidence for punitive damages.” Mark Rattan of Chicago’s Litchfield Cavo, who represented Travelers, did not return calls seeking comment. Edward Ruff of Chicago’s Pretzel & Stouffer represented Federal. He declined to comment on the case, except to say his client will seek an appeal.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.