Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
Minimal evidence of the existence of a safer alternative design for an allegedly defective product is enough to get a plaintiff's case to a jury, the Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled. The court relied on a state decision that surveyed several appellate opinions finding "specifics were not required" and adequate evidence was presented with the proffer of "some" evidence of a safer alternative design.
August 28, 2001 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS