Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
A prosecutor who conspires to fabricate evidence can be held liable for violating a defendant’s constitutional rights, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled. Drawing a distinction between prosecutors’ roles as advocates and investigators, the court held that prosecutors can be sued for fabricating evidence in the course of investigation, even though they are completely immune from civil rights suits for their acts as advocates. However, the ruling by the three-judge panel leaves a great deal unsettled, since the court did not decide whether the prosecutor was acting as advocate or investigator in the case at issue. The decision in Zahrey v. Coffey, 99-9119, revived a civil rights suit against Assistant U.S. Attorney Martin E. Coffey that had been dismissed last September by Judge Loretta A. Preska of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff, police officer Zaher Zahrey, was arrested in October 1996 on charges that he had conspired to rob drug dealers. He was acquitted at trial, but only after spending eight months in jail. Zahrey then brought a civil rights suit against other police officers, local prosecutors and Coffey, in which one of the allegations was that Coffey conspired to manufacture evidence against him, depriving him of liberty without due process of law. Zahrey accused the authorities of convincing witnesses to testify falsely by offering them incentives including, in one case, $1,300 in rent money. Coffey moved to dismiss before trial, arguing that, as a prosecutor, he was entitled to immunity from civil rights suits. His position was that he had absolute immunity for acts done as an advocate and qualified immunity for acts done as an investigator. The lower court agreed that Coffey had qualified immunity for his actions while investigating the case and then dismissed the suit against him, ruling that case law as of 1996 did not clearly establish that fabricating evidence could constitute a violation of constitutional rights. “FALSE EVIDENCE” But the Second Circuit went the opposite way, ruling that the prosecutor was on notice that using false evidence might subject him to liability. “It has … long been established that a prosecutor who knowingly uses false evidence at trial to obtain a conviction acts unconstitutionally,” wrote Judge Jon O. Newman for the court. “Any prosecutor aware of [the case law] would understand that fabricating evidence in his investigative role violates the standards of due process and that a resulting loss of liberty is a denial of a constitutional right.” The Second Circuit remanded the case for trial, noting that Coffey could still be immune from suit if he had acted in his role as an advocate. Newman was joined in his decision by Judges Amalya L. Kearse and Jose Cabranes. Zahrey was represented by Joel B. Rudin of New York. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Martin J. Siegel and Jeffrey Oestericher argued for the defense. Joshua L. Dratel and Marshall A. Mintz, both of New York, submitted an amicus brief for the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and The New York State Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.