This year’s presidential primaries might have reflected substantial popular concern about antitrust policy. After all, we’re in the midst of an unprecedented merger wave that is dramatically restructuring industry after industry. A technological revolution is rapidly building the New Economy, threatening the Old Economy, and spawning high-visibility antitrust suits — led, of course, by United States v. Microsoft. And deregulation has proven less successful than it could have been because antitrust has failed to play its intended role of overseeing market forces.

Opponents of antitrust, often citing the Microsoft case, argue that globalization and high technology have rendered antitrust law obsolete. Yet after its near-death experience with Reaganomics, antitrust has rebounded with vigor. There’s plenty to talk about, but does the electorate care?

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]