A federal appeals court in Chicago on Friday upheld a lower court decision to throw out as defendants a Chicago lawyer and his firm in a sordid Cicero civil conspiracy case on the ground that there simply was no viable legal theory to be applied.

But despite the ruling, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel took time in its opinion to question the ethics of attorney Jerome H. Torshen. What particularly concerned the court was the fact that, while representing the plaintiff in the course of the conspiracy battle against the town of Cicero, Torshen negotiated a settlement that contained a unique provision calling for him to be later retained by the town in another case.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]