The Supreme Court on Wednesday heard arguments in Dickerson v. United States , a case that some law enforcement officials hope will send Miranda v. Arizona to the dustbin. The decision is likely to be close. But a majority of justices seemed unconvinced that a 1968 law passed by Congress to counter Miranda is adequate to protect the Fifth Amendment right against forced self-incrimination.
April 19, 2000 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Predictions of doom for the Miranda warning may be premature.
The Supreme Court on Wednesday heard arguments in Dickerson v. United States, a case that some law enforcement officials and conservatives hope will send the famed 1966 Miranda v. Arizona decision to the dustbin.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
