Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
When Chicago attorney Daniel Sanders met condemned murderer Anthony Porter in 1998, Porter’s future seemed bleak. His date with death was imminent, and Porter had already made his own funeral arrangements and ordered his last meal. Other lawyers had given up on Porter. But Sanders, a former software systems designer just four years out of law school, saw an injustice in the facts of Porter’s prosecution and decided to dedicate himself to saving Porter’s life. A year later, Sanders not only got Porter off death row, but also exonerated him of the double murder that had kept him behind bars for more than 16 years. The personal cost of Sanders’ crusade was considerable. By devoting himself solely to the case, he had let his general practice slide and ended up nearly bankrupt. Earlier this year, however, a chance developed for Sanders to earn some significant fees to offset all his hard, low-paying work. In March, Porter authorized the filing of a suit against the city of Chicago and its police department to seek damages for malicious prosecution and false imprisonment. Sanders retained former appellate judge R. Eugene Pincham to help him. But in April, a fax unexpectedly arrived informing him and Pincham that Porter had decided that the newly formed Chicago firm of Cochran, Cherry, Givens, Smith & Montgomery would be taking over as lead counsel in the juicy civil case. That’s Cochran as in Johnnie Cochran, of O.J. Simpson fame. Montgomery is former Chicago Corporation Counsel James Montgomery, also a top lawyer. Sanders and Pincham did not quietly accept this hardball attempt to elbow them out of the limelight and the cash. At a June 23 motion hearing, in Circuit Court in Chicago, they challenged the substitution, alleging, in part, that Montgomery had a conflict of interest because of his former association with the city. Circuit Judge Kathy Flanagan didn’t buy that, approving the substitution of counsel and suggesting Sanders’ (and Pincham’s) remedy might lie in filing a lien for expenses and work done. Montgomery said the two lawyers were just trying to embarrass him. Cochran was not immediately available.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.