A woman who wears a prosthetic device because she lost four digits on her left hand is disabled under anti-discrimination laws and can maintain a claim that she was improperly denied training to become an operating room technician, a judge in Manhattan has ruled.

Justice Eileen Bransten in Shine v. Roosevelt Hospital, filed last month in Supreme Court, New York County, IA Part 21, No. 10257/99, rejected Roosevelt Hospital’s contention that a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling should bar Robin Shine from suing under the antidiscrimination statutes because she is able to function normally with her prosthetic device.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]