San Diego, Calif.’s old-line Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps discriminates against would-be employees by making them sign mandatory arbitration clauses as a condition of work, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has alleged in federal court.

Weighing in on an issue that has already been rejected by the state Supreme Court, the EEOC filed its suit Feb. 7 in U.S. district court in Los Angeles, seeking unspecified compensatory and punitive damages for legal secretary Donald Lagatree.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]