Syllabus
NOTE: The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but hasbeen prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for theconvenience of the reader.
The case United States v. Haggar Apparel Co. (97-2044) concerned regulations relating to customs classifications of certain imported goods. Haggar was seeking a refund of custom duties paid on goods assembled in Mexico and shipped back to the U.S. The federal government argued -- successfully -- that customs regulations are entitled to judicial deference under Chevron doctrine. The Federal Circuit and the Court on International Trade had disagreed with the government's position.
April 22, 1999 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Syllabus
NOTE: The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but hasbeen prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for theconvenience of the reader.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS