In the heat of criminal trials, prosecutorial misconduct isn’t usually fatal. A “curative” jury instruction is the standard antidote to prejudicial remarks or references to facts outside the case.

It’s rare that a single sentence from a prosecutor spoils the fairness of a trial. That actually happened, however, in State v. Harold Trent Butler, where a split Appellate Court panel ruled Nov. 2 that a prosecutor’s remark was simply too mindbending to cure with admonishments.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]