When the justices agreed to decide a pre-emption question on airbags, this year's term became the must-watch kind. Before the Sept. 10 grant of certiorari in Geier v. American Honda Motor Co. , only the battle between the tobacco industry and the Food and Drug Administration over tobacco regulation offered some drama on the court's business docket. But Geier has major ramifications for the auto industry and other businesses.
September 28, 1999 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
For the business community, the difference between a ho-hum and a must-watch U.S. Supreme Court term is a matter of three or four cases, says a longtime litigator.
When the justices agreed to decide a pre-emption question on airbags, this year’s term became the must-watch kind.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
