The age-old rule that a judge could invite jurors to draw a negative conclusion from the absence of a witness is now history.

A unanimous state Supreme Court concludes that the so-called Secondino rule, which has deep roots in old English law, is an inherently unfair way to search out truth in light of modern court rules and discovery practices.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]