Affirming a Bronx man’s perjury conviction for lying in a civil proceeding, a federal appeals panel in Manhattan last week went out of its way to denounce such lies and declare, as if joining the Clinton impeachment debate, that such prosecutions are “unremarkable.”

The panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in United States v. Feliz, 98-1254, mainly rejected specific due process claims raised by Melvin Feliz. Mr. Feliz argued that his rights were violated by a four-year gap between his lies at a 1993 civil trial alleging police brutality and his 1997 perjury indictment.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]