In a case of apparent first impression, a federal judge in Manhattan has rejected a challenge to government security clearance requirements for attorneys representing men accused of the bombings of U.S. Embassies. Ruling on a pretrial motion, Judge Leonard B. Sand said there was no way around some form of security clearance for defense attorneys who need access to discovery materials marked classified by the U.S. government.
July 01, 1999 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
In a case of apparent first impression, a Southern District judge has rejected a challenge to government security clearance requirements for attorneys representing men accused of the bombings of U.S. Embassies.
Ruling on a pretrial motion, Judge Leonard B. Sand said there was no way around some form of security clearance for defense attorneys who need access to discovery materials marked classified by the U.S. government in the case, United States v. Bin Laden, S(6) 98 Crim. 1023.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
