The Insulation of federal judges from political pressures was central to the arguments Friday as the Second Circuit considered District Judge Harold Baer’s controversial 1996 decision to reverse himself on the suppression of evidence in the case of United States v. Bayless.
Tracy W. Young, the appellate lawyer for Carol Bayless, said there was little question that the firestorm of criticism following Judge Baer’s decision to suppress 80 pounds of cocaine following a Washington Heights arrest in 1995 undoubtedly led Judge Baer to reconsider his ruling, reopen the suppression hearing and allow the drugs as evidence.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]