A recent NY Court of Appeals ruling upholding partial enforceability of an accounting firm's noncompete agreement is expected to prompt more employers to impose similar agreements on employees who interact with company clients, according to employment attorneys. The decision could also encourage courts faced with overly broad noncompete agreements to consider partial enforcement as an alternative to complete invalidation.
May 27, 1999 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
A recent New York Court of Appeals ruling upholding partial enforceability of an accounting firm’s noncompete agreement is expected to prompt more employers to impose similar agreements on employees who interact with company clients, according to employment attorneys.
The decision, BDO Seidman v Hirshberg, could also encourage courts faced with overly broad noncompete agreements to consider partial enforcement as an alternative to complete invalidation.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
