For two decades, scholars from very different points of view have been plotting a quiet revolution: the resurrection of a long-dead constitutional principle buried in the 14th Amendment. Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court's decision striking down California's cap on welfare payments for new residents has constitutional experts of every stripe buzzing because its reasoning focuses on the amendment's "privileges or immunities" clause.
May 24, 1999 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
For two decades in the back rooms of the legal academy, scholars from very different points on the ideological chart had been plotting a quiet revolution: the resurrection of a long-dead constitutional principle buried in the 14th Amendment.
Last week, the Supreme Court validated their efforts.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
