Nine 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judges publicly sided with a controversial San Francisco plaintiffs lawyer in his fight to keep filing ADA lawsuits in California's Central District.
April 09, 2008 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Nine 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judges publicly sided with a controversial San Francisco plaintiffs lawyer in his fight to keep filing ADA lawsuits in California’s Central District.
But for Thomas Frankovich and his client, Jarek Molski, nine wasn’t enough: The appellate court declined to take the case en banc Monday, over those judges’ objections.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
