Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Re: “Employers told to stay away from video resum�s” [NLJ, June 4]. This article addressed potential concerns over discrimination cases occurring because of video r�sum�s. I was disappointed in it because all of the arguments against video r�sum�s were presented by attorneys in a rather one-sided narrow view of a new technology, which I would characterize as a good example of overlawyering and underbusinessing. As an attorney who has partnered with three other attorneys to build a suite of video-interviewing and video-r�sum� tools for summer associate hiring, I want to take issue with some of the arguments raised by the attorneys. The article does a good job of showing that the business world is very interested in video tools. But I would suggest that this overwhelming interest is due not to a motive to discriminate or a “reality television craze,” as one of the attorneys suggests, but that it arises because video r�sum�s offer a three-dimensional view of a candidate showing selling ability, maturity, professional appearance, clarity and coherence. Nor do employers make hiring decisions based completely on a video r�sum�s. R�sum�s, writing samples, references, and, yes, video r�sum�s only help to get a candidate’s foot in the door. But the hiring decision in every job I have been involved in placing came from the final face-to-face interviews. What I think the lawyer commentators were really saying is that the chance of creating evidence of discrimination is enhanced through video tools. I think better legal advice would be to say, “Continue to use video tools, just don’t use them for an evil purpose. Train your hiring personnel about the risks of discrimination.” Let lawyers stick to the job of advising how to use these tools without discriminating. Karl Schieneman Pittsburgh

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.