X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
A recent Delaware Supreme Court decision may have undermined cases against directors and officers of companies for actions they take just before they file for bankruptcy, such as increasing the company’s debt or signing major contracts with creditors. The court ruled in May that creditors of a Delaware corporation that is insolvent or in the so-called “zone of insolvency” have no right to assert direct claims for breach of fiduciary duty against its directors. Some lawyers believe the decision eliminates the threat of suits that seek to recover from directors for actions they took shortly before bankruptcy. The case was filed by “putative creditor” North American Catholic Educational Programming Foundation Inc. against three directors of the Delaware corporation, Clearwire Holdings Inc., which had agreed to buy the foundation’s Federal Communications Commission-approved licenses for microwave signal transmission to build a national wireless Internet network. North American Catholic Educational Programming Foundation Inc. v. Rob Gheewalla, No. 06-521 (Del.). But a lawyer involved in a $41.5 million settlement with outside directors reached in March in a separate suit against directors of bankrupt Birmingham, Ala., shoe retailer Just For Feet Inc. said that companies nearing insolvency must still safeguard creditors’ interests to avoid lawsuits. In the Just For Feet Inc. bankruptcy, the bankruptcy trustee filed a lawsuit in Alabama state court against the company’s directors, officers, accounting firm and independent auditors for breaches of fiduciary duty, fraud and related claims for the company’s actions as it neared bankruptcy or entered the zone of insolvency. There is no legal definition of “zone of insolvency,” but lawyers say it refers to when a company nears insolvency or is at the point at which it can’t pay its debts. The trustee said that the defendants’ decisions to ignore expert advice to file a Chapter 11 restructuring and conceal the company’s shaky financial status for two years led to a $90 million fire-sale liquidation of the company’s assets. Charles R. Goldstein, Chapter 7 Trustee for Just For Feet Inc. v. Harold Ruttenberg, No. 01-06833 (Jefferson Co., Ala., Cir. Ct.). Just For Feet could have been reorganized in a healthy way that preserved a substantial amount of value, and the settlement shows that zone-of-insolvency theories are alive and well, said Professor John Freeman of the University of South Carolina School of Law, a consultant to the trustee’s lawyers. “That should never have happened,” Freeman said. “Those people who let it happen should be responsible.” James Carroll, a Boston partner at New York’s Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom who was part of the Just For Feet directors’ defense team, said that confidentiality provisions prevented him from discussing the case. In bankruptcy courts and state courts, lawyers have been testing claims and damages theories involving the duties of a company’s directors as a company nears bankruptcy or enters the zone of insolvency and “deepening insolvency.” Lawyers disagree about whether the recent Delaware Supreme Court decision rejecting direct creditor claims for breach of fiduciary duty when companies enter the zone of insolvency, or are actually insolvent, shuts the door on director liability in those circumstances. Although he declined to comment directly on the Just For Feet case, a lawyer who represented the trustee that sued Just for Feet’s directors said directors’ and officers’ duties expand when a company is failing. “When a company is in the zone of insolvency, different considerations and potential liability are implicated for directors, especially when options alternate to Chapter 11 can result in a deepening insolvency,” said trustee lawyer William F. Ryan Jr., who is also chairman of the business litigation section at Whiteford, Taylor & Preston in Baltimore. Courts inconsistent Cases involving zone-of-insolvency and deepening-insolvency issues have been a developing trend in the past several years, said Lawrence Yumkas, chief operating officer of insolvency consulting firm ACG Ltd. in Annapolis, Md. “In bankruptcies, it’s incumbent upon trustees to pursue claims against directors, if they exist, for the benefit of creditors and shareholders,” Yumkas said. Despite the popularity of the theories, courts have been inconsistent on whether zone of insolvency and deepening insolvency are causes of action or a fact pattern, Yumkas said. “There really is no national consensus on what it means,” Yumkas said. Court decisions opened the door to such claims a few years ago, but the pendulum has recently shifted. A 3d U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision in 2006 said that only fraud, not negligence, can support a deepening-insolvency claim under Pennsylvania law, said Jonathan K. Hollin, a lawyer at Powell, Trachtman, Logan, Carrle & Lombardo in King of Prussia, Pa., who represented the company that prevailed in the case. In re CitX Corp. Inc., Gary Seitz Ch. 7 Trustee v. Detweiler Hersey & Associates P.C., 448 F.3d 672 (3d Cir. 2006). “You had favorable language in [a prior 3d Circuit decision] and people were running with it,” Hollin said. “In CitX, the court reined it in.” Later in 2006, a Delaware court of chancery rejected deepening insolvency as an independent cause of action under Delaware law. Trenwick America Litigation Trust v. Ernst & Young LLP, 906 A.2d 168 (New Castle Co., Del., Ch.). Delaware case Lawyers are now pointing to the May 18 Delaware Supreme Court decision in the North American Catholic case as a significant milestone in the zone-of-insolvency debate. The Delaware Supreme Court upheld a Delaware court of chancery decision that dismissed a putative creditor’s case against three directors of wireless Internet company Clearwire Holdings Inc. for breaches of fiduciary duty while the company was in the zone of insolvency or insolvent. The court said that creditors of a Delaware corporation that is insolvent or in the zone of insolvency “have no right, as a matter of law, to assert direct claims for breach of fiduciary duty against its directors. “Recognizing that directors of an insolvent corporation owe direct fiduciary duties to creditors would create uncertainty for directors who have a fiduciary duty to exercise their business judgment in the best interest of the insolvent corporation,” wrote Justice Randy Holland. The Delaware decision erases the threat of direct claims by creditors against directors, but it doesn’t mean zone-of-insolvency issues are dead, Hollin said. Many such lawsuits are already filed as derivative cases on behalf of a corporation by a bankruptcy trustee, an insurance company receiver or a creditor’s committee, said Hollin of Powell Trachtman. “It doesn’t take away the zone-of-insolvency issues,” Hollin said. “It says they’ve got to be brought in a derivative manner on behalf of the corporation, not by individual creditors.” Lawyers involved in the North American Catholic case said it means insolvent companies could face derivative suits, but the Delaware Supreme Court didn’t directly discuss whether companies in the amorphous zone of insolvency could also face derivative claims.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.