X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
SACRAMENTO � A Los Angeles judge who “belittled” an attorney and issued “unwarranted” orders to show cause was publicly admonished ( .pdf) by the Commission on Judicial Performance Wednesday. Superior Court Judge Ronald Sohigian routinely issued OSCs to plaintiffs for failing to appear at the initial status conference in civil cases even when they were not legally required to be there, the commission found. Sohigian would also repeatedly delay hearings on OSCs so he could “wait until further developments had occurred in the case to see whether he wanted to issue sanctions,” according to the commission report. Sohigian told the commission he regrets using the OSCs as a case management tool and no longer issues the order forms he was using. But he also asked commissioners to suspend its review of the case against him while he asked the Judicial Council what precisely an OSC form should contain. Sohigian said he found OSC forms similar to the ones he used in courts around California. Commissioners refused his request. “The misconduct in that practice was not the accidental byproduct of a poorly drafted form,” the commission said. “The misconduct was Judge Sohigian’s determination to issue OSCs for the improper purpose of compelling innocent parties and counsel to provide testimony under threat of sanctions.” The commission also concluded that Sohigian was rude and sarcastic to an attorney in an April 2006 case involving a firm seeking fees from past clients. In one exchange, the attorney said he didn’t have a document Sohigian requested. Then he asked to check a box to see if he could find it. “Before you said you didn’t have it so there would be no reason to look for it,” Sohigian said. “For example, if someone were to ask me to look for a $10,000 bill in my pocket, I wouldn’t say, just a second. I’ll look for it. I pretty much would know.” Six commissioners voted for public admonishment while two said Sohigian should have received private discipline. In 1991, the commission issued the judge an advisory letter for abusing his authority in sanctioning attorneys.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.